Mutual Destruction - an Unholy Trinity of Desperation

Alternative Insight

Mutual Destruction
The United States, Iran and Israel - an Unholy Trinity of Desperation

Contrary to conventional thinking, the United States, Iran and Israel have much in common. Each of these nations is:

isolating itself from the world community,
losing friends and making enemies,
behaving in belligerent fashions,
remaining irresolute in its demands of other nations, and
propelling one another towards war.

The three countries are forming an unholy trinity of inescapable desperation, leading to mutual destruction.

The Inescapable Desperations

United States
Since 1954, when the CIA conspired in the downfall of newly installed Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh after he threatened to nationalize the oil industry, and the U.S. enabled the fervent anti-Communist Shah Pahlevi to gain power, U.S. foreign policy towards Iran has had a single trajectory; to make an enemy of Iran's post-Shah governments (1979). The U.S. government:

In 1980, allowed the deposed Shah to enter the U.S. for medical treatment, despite Iranian protests. This event provoked extremists in Iran to seize the American embassy and hold embassy officials captive.
During the 1980's, provided arms and support to Iran's enemy, Iraq, in the eight-year war between the two nations.
In 1987 moved warships into the Straits of Hormuz to protect the Persian Gulf shipping, interfered with Iranian shipping, and caused losses to Iran's small navy.
On July 3, 1988, shot down an Iranian civilian airliner in Iran territorial waters and killed all 290 civilian passengers.
Since 1967, actively supported Israel, Iran's most ardent enemy.
For a decade, supplied arms to Gulf nations that became antagonists of Iran.
Since 1980 has proposed and implrmented a variety of sanctioins against Iran.
In February 2006, according to The UK Telegraph, prepared "last resort" plans for "devastating bombing raids backed by submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks against Iran's nuclear sites."
In 2006, still maintained, for strategic reasons, U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf close to Iranian borders.
On 15 Feb. 2006 proposed to ask for $75 Million To Promote Democracy in Iran.

A recent poll demonstrates the effectiveness of propaganda by which the United States has presented Iran as a formidable enemy.

WASHINGTON - Iran has replaced Iraq as the country Americans consider to be their greatest enemy, according to a Gallup Poll. Canada and Great Britain were ranked as America's best friends. Thirty-one percent of Americans gave the nod to Iran as the worst enemy in polling of 1,002 adults between Feb. 6-9. This represented an increase from 14 percent last year, and appeared to reflect growing American concern over the potential for the Islamic republic to acquire nuclear weapons.
GEORGE GEDDA, Associated Press Writer, Feb 24, 2006

U.S. descriptions of Iran sound ominously similar to the pre-Iraq war descriptions of Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Iran
The Islamic Republic has been aggressively vocal in condemning the United States but less aggressive in physical attacks against America. In comparison to U.S. actions, which have provided military assistance to nations that are Iran's enemies, violated Iranian sovereignty, caused deaths to Iranian citizens and damaged military and civilian infrastructure, Iranian attacks on American facilities and personnel have been minimal, not entirely verified and often the result of attacks against it:

In 1980, Iranian extremists (not the government) seized the American embassy in Teheran and kept captive the embassy employees after the Carter administration allowed the Shah to enter the United States.
In the 1983 bombing of the Beirut marine barracks, in which 241 U.S. military personnel were killed, and which occurred after U.S. shelling of communities in the Lebanon Shouf mountains,rumors had Iran assisting the incipient Lebanese Hezbollah in the barracks attack.
In the June 1996 bombing of U.S. military barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, which claimed the lives of 19 U.S. servicemen, although no conclusive proof was established, investigators accused Iran of involvement.
In 1987, during the Iranian/Iraqi war, and after U.S. warships entered the Persian Gulf, Iran harassed American vessels with periodic stop-and-search operations, mined channels, performed hit-and-run attacks by small patrol boats. Iranian forces shelled the reflagged tanker Sea Isle City, and the U.S. aggressively retaliated by destroying an oil platform in the Rostam field and another oil platform.

There is no limit to combative words by Iranian officials, especially lately. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blamed the United States and Israel for the February 2006 terrorist attack that destroyed Samarra's Askariya mosque.

And of course, there is Iran's attempt to develop nuclear energy , which it claims has no military intention, but has alarmed the Western world.

Iran's attitude towards Israel is more strongly militant than its attitude towards the United States. Iran definitely provides military assistance to Hezbollah, the Lebanese force that aggressively contests Israel, and also assists the Palestinians in their struggle against Israeli occupation. The latter assistance is not unique - many nations and institutions assist the Palestinians and most of the world, including the United Nations, consider Israel's occupation of the West Bank to be illegal and oppressive.

An Iranian adviser has said that Iran would strike Israel in response to U.S. attack:

If the United States launches an attack on Iran, the Islamic republic will retaliate with a military strike on Israel's main nuclear facility, an advisor to Iran's Revolutionary Guard said. The advisor, Dr. Abasi, said Tehran would respond to an American attack with strikes on the Dimona nuclear reactor and other strategic Israeli sites such as the port city of Haifa and the Zakhariya area.
Yossi Melman, Haaretz , Feb. 26, 20006

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejed has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map," and insisted that the major problem in the Islamic world is "the presence of the Zionist occupation in the heart of the Islamic region."

Nevertheless, Mahmoud Ahmadinejed's words are not policy. The Iranian president does not dictate Iran's foreign policy or control Iran's military.The Supreme Leader, a religious figure selected by an Assembly of Experts, controls Iran's armed forces and its judiciary. The Supreme Leader has been more conciliatory. Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei spoke more moderately to other government officials on November 4, 2005:

We believe, according to our Islamic principles, that neither throwing the Jews into the sea nor putting the Palestinian land on fire is logical and reasonable. Our position is that the Palestinian people should regain their rights. Palestine belongs to Palestinians, and the fate of Palestine should also be determined by the Palestinian people.

Israel
With the demise of Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Israel considers Iran as its principal enemy, and it is correct. Iran supports Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestine Hamas, two groups dedicated to the destruction of Israel. If Israel concludes that war would be reduce Iran to an impotent force, Israel would undoubtedly attack Iran. Meanwhile, Israel whips up world opinion against Tehran and joins the United States in making calculated threats and becoming a possible ally in direct military action against Iran. The rumors fly and one in late 2005 from the London Sunday Times was alarming:

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has ordered the IDF to prepare to attack Iran's nuclear facilities at the end of March 2006: London Sunday Times correspondent Uzi Mahnaimi

Israel's present hope in containing Iran is mainly by sanctions and legal means. Israel's response to the Iranian offer to contribute to the financial support of Hamas demonstrates this assessment. Israeli foreign ministry spokesman, Mark Regev, said, "Israel would be entitled to use all legal means to prevent that money from reaching its destination."

The three belligerent nations have presented their non-compromising arguments. Their next step is military confrontation.

The Shaping Battlefronts
Israel suspects that sometime, somewhere and somehow, Iran will attack it. Unless something dramatically changes the situation, the present Israel/Palestinian confrontation is for all time. Israel has seized Palestinian land and Palestinians have been brought to great desperation and a wider diaspora than Arab and Middle East Islamic nations (Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan) will tolerate. Israel is at its peak military strength; Iran can only get stronger, which includes possession of the nuclear bomb. While it has a rational for an attack - Iran's developments of nuclear energy leading to a nuclear bomb - Israel would prefer to strike; but how?

The United States has no clear issue with Iran that deserves to be resolved by war, except for preventing Iran's development of a nuclear bomb. U.S. intelligence agencies project that Iran is "about a decade away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon," and its delivery weapons are many years away. During that interval, the U.S. anticipates democracy will arrive at Iran's door and be embraced by the Iranian people.

The U.S. is more vulnerable than Israel to Iranian attacks. The Iranians can attack the U.S. fleet in the Persian Gulf and U.S. troops in Iraq and Kuwait. Despite this vulnerability, media reports suggest that U.S. strategists are planning for potential military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Iran is militarily hapless - no warships, mostly antiquated air force, dubious air defenses and some missile systems which can cause limited damage. Iran can only fight a defensive war, but it is not powerless. Teheran has some major trump cards.

Iraq's cleric, Moqtada al-Sadr, commander of an Iraq militia and a serious power broker In Iraq, declared In Iran last month that he would fight alongside Iran if the United States attacked the Islamic state. Considering the growing hostility to American troops in Iraq, combine the Mehdi militia with weapons from Iran and U.S. forces will be in great trouble. "If Iran wanted, it could make Iraq a hell for the United States," Hamid al-Bayati, Iraq's deputy foreign minister, said recently.
Iran has paramilitary units that could join with Lebanon's Hezbollah and Palestinian militants and attack Israel.
Iran has the capability to temporarily interrupt oil flow by reducing its oil exports, closing the straits of Hormuz to oil shipments from the Persian Gulf, soliciting assistance in destroying oil facilities in Iraq, especially at the port of Basra, and using paramilitary forces to destroy other Middle East oil facilities.
Paramilitary units and missiles could damage U.S. military facilities in Kuwait .
More militant groups in the Moslem world could react aggressively in the defense of Iran. The Middle East and possibly other regions of the world could be in turmoil.
Other third world nations that have gained economic power, such as Venezuela, also support Iran and might join in economic reprisals against the United States and Israel.

The rhetoric, lack of diplomacy and preparation for aggressive actions lead to a world being shaped by aggression. The actions lead to mutual destruction.

Mutual Destruction
The United States and Israel cannot invade Iran and destroy its government. They can only bomb nuclear and military facilities. In doing this, the allied nations must be careful they don't interrupt Iran's oil producing capacity or harm its civilian population. Iran and its vast allies throughout the Moslem world can inflict more harm to a multitude of U.S. and Israeli installations and great harm to populations. Iran and its allies don't have to inflict damage in a short time; they can do it forever. The U.S. and Israel are opening themselves to an era of constant havoc and economic warfare. Iran will also suffer but much less, at least until the ultimate weapons are used.

The three nations are determined to destroy one another and eventually themselves.

The Unholy Trinity of Desperation
The United States, Iran and Israel are leading the world to a cataclysm. Why does the world permit this happening and why does the United States make itself a partner in the travesty?

Washington has no issue with Tehran that cannot be negotiated. What danger is Iran to an America that behaves responsibly, which means not interfering in the affairs of nations in the Middle East. Iran has no problem with Japan or China or Sweden. Why must Iran have a problem with the U.S.? The U.S. might not prefer the Islamic government, but why is that a problem for the United States? After all, one of the best friends of the U.S. is Saudi Arabia, a fundamentalist Islamic nation.

Israel has issues with Iran, but Iran's attitude is not different from most nations that demand Israel modify its aggressive stance and return to being the nation permitted by the 1947 UN Resolution that created it.

Let's repeat the words of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei.

We believe, according to our Islamic principles, that neither throwing the Jews into the sea nor putting the Palestinian land on fire is logical and reasonable. Our position is that the Palestinian people should regain their rights. Palestine belongs to Palestinians, and the fate of Palestine should also be determined by the Palestinian people.

Israel claimed it was threatened by Saddam Hussein's Iraq. Saddam Hussein has been deposed and Israel is more threatened by the combination of the new Iraq and the old Iran. Israel is forever threatened because Israel appears to its neighbors as a virulent nationalist, militarist and chauvinist nation that uses security to occupy lands, replace indigenous people, oppress Palestinians and constantly threaten others. Israel's problems seem to have no end and can only be resolved by endless wars, which means until it or the Middle East disappears.

Iran is a theocratic and intolerant state that is at odds with the progress of mankind. Its domestic policies isolate it from the world community and so it finds friends with some radical muslim organizations; namely Hezbollah and Hamas, that contest the interests that Iran feels infringes upon Islam and its own peace. However, its problems are principally internal and only accidentally external. Iran directly supports those it considers being oppressed by Israel and is definitely opposed to the Israeli state. However, arguments that Iran supports international terrorism have never been adequately proved. Iran has no special reason to harm the United States and no capability to do harm without itself being demolished. The Islamic state has no territorial ambitions and can't spread its religious doctrines because of the limitations of Shiism in the Moslem world. Actually, Iran has often allied itself with U.S. interests by vigorously opposing the enemies of the United States.

Iran was a prominent enemy of Saddam Hussein's Iraq,
Iran opposed Afghanistan's Taliban after the the Taliban murdered 10 Iranian diplomats in August 1998.
Iran always opposed Soviet Union's communism.
Iran detained and extradited 500 suspected Al-Qaeda fugitives who crossed onto its soil.
Notably, unlike America's friend Pakistan that houses Al Queda operatives and Taliban militias on its border, no Al Queda or Taliban actions have proceeded from Iranian territory that borders Afghanistan.

Decades of antagonism between the United States and The Islamic Republic have only reinforced the antagonisms and have propelled the two nations to an eventual collision.

All three nations, United States, Iran and Israel should take notice of the effects of their aggressive actions and halt them before they lead to mutual destruction. America must decide if it either wants to be tied to Israel's endless policies of confrontation that will lead all to an abyss, or wants to consider salvation by following the words of Abraham Lincoln:

I got rid of my enemies by making them my friends.

alternativeinsight
March 1, 2006
HOME PAGE     MAIN PAGE
 
alternativeinsight@earthlink.net